Htun Teza
No Burmese version of this page
Mahidol University, the author's affiliation at the time of this work
Journal articles, Surgeon

External validation and revision of Penn incisional hernia prediction model: A large-scale retrospective cohort of abdominal operations

  1. 1Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
  2. 2Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand
  3. 3Information Technology Department, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
  4. 4Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
  5. 5School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Australia
  6. 6Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia
  7. 7Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Surgeon

Abstract

Background: Incisional hernia (IH) manifests in 10–15% of abdominal surgeries and patients at elevated risk should be identified for prophylactic intervention. This study aimed to externally validate the Penn hernia risk calculator.

Methods: The Ramathibodi abdominal surgery cohort was constructed by linking relevant hospital databases from 2010 to 2021. Penn hernia risk scores were calculated according to the original model and externally validated using a seven-step approach. An updated model adding four additional predictors (age, immunosuppressive medication, ostomy reversal, and transfusion) to the three original predictors (BMI, chronic liver disease, and open surgery) was also evaluated.

Results: A total of 12,155 abdominal operations were assessed. The original Penn model yielded fair discrimination (AUC 0.645; 95% CI 0.607–0.683). The updated model achieved an acceptable AUC of 0.733 (95% CI 0.698–0.768) with an observed/expected ratio of 0.968 (0.848–1.088).

Conclusions: The updated model achieved improved discrimination and calibration performance, and should be considered for the identification of high-risk patients for hernia prevention strategy.

Find this paper

Cite this paper

Conditions
Abdominal SurgeryIncisional Hernia
Data
ThailandRamathibodi HospitalCEB Data WarehouseElectronic Health Records
Methods
StatisticsLogistic RegressionValidation